4 thoughts on “Nope, I still don’t care about the Chick-fil-A controversy

  1. These are some excellent points. You seem to be describing a problem of bandwagon politics, jump on to a side when it gets press play, that is until the next hot issue comes up and then its jump on that bandwagon. This really reminds me of college students who rally to every protest without knowing what they are really protesting against or how to carry out a protest with a chance of making actual change. Both bandwagon and protest rallying make you feel like you are part of a solution, but without having to do any of the hard work of actually working for real change.

  2. I would file a lot of this under the illusion of choice. Sure, you can choose what you eat or where you eat it, but the idea that your choice, even in concert with others, is consequential is overly deterministic. What activists are asking you to believe is basically the butterfly effect but as applied to economics. It is naively empowering.

    If one cares about the conduct and regulation of business, modification of one’s own behavior is fairly ineffectual. One should rather look to the actual power structures, be that government through regulation or government through employee empowerment. People place far too much importance upon caring and not enough importance upon being effectual.

  3. Pingback: On cheap activism and other notes | The rose in the cross

Comments are closed.